dep file: file1_module.mod : \Ĭ:\project\AreaSub.f90 圆4\Release\file1_module.mod A small example with one module "file1_module.f90" and one subroutine "AreaSub.f90" would give the. dep file with all the source files and their dependencies I did a rebuild all from VS so that all the project files would be included in the. dep file to get the format I wanted for the makefile.
Once I obtained the *.dep file from Visual Studio and Intel Fortran (on Windows) I did some text parsing of the file listing in the. Some Stackoverflow articles recommended creating the makefile manually. Has anyone used one of these tools, such as Makedepf90, to create a makefile? ( ) If yes, was it useful, and advice on using it? This forum topic listed a few tools that could help:
#Makefile cross compile c linux mac os mod
mod dependencies? I'm guessing I'll need to be careful to get the module dependencies handled correctly in the make file. Would it be best to rebuild the solution so that all the source files get listed in the BuildLog.htm file? Then use a text editor to create the rules to compile each source file? Is the order of the files in the BuildLog.htm significant in terms of. This Intel article recommends using the information from the BuildLog.htm file to help create a makefile: The best leads I've found from web searching are these: Are automated tools available to create the Linux makefile from the Windows VS. The next project to port has several hundred Fortran source files. Our current work flow is to develop on Windows in VS with Intel Fortran (build in VS), then port the project source code to Linux and build there using a makefile and the Intel Linux Fortran. I'm creating makefiles to build Fortran projects on Linux.